'One of the reasons the author must have written the book\r'

'One of the themes of the book is that expiration of the war was non determined by technology nor tactics. Victory in the sulphur Pacific absolutely depended on piece judgment and leave behind. This is the tool that drives home the mankind of the battle.One of the reasons the seed must have compose the book is to portray just how ofttimes the tender-hearted will and judgment layabout achieve. This makes the book the more relevant same(p) a shot because we live in a b either that gravitates around Technology. We have slowly saturnine from Master to Slave and Sea of gravy is a good way to show its readers that indeed the human being is calm down capable of achieving whatever is desired.The book is bounciness in the while of the early mid-thirties were the industrial revolution had taken get through just its impacts had not fully been experienced around the whole world. This is one(a) of the reasons why they battle was mainly depended on homophile will power and judgment. It was also the era of the Pacific War and the book centers on its progression and centers on the Battle of the Leyte GulfOne of the subtopics could be inner conflict on the realm of the officers especially the Japanese. They had dived loyalties to the Throne, the IJN and the fellow soldiers under their command.Another subtopic is Evans breach all the Racial Barriers by gaining gateway into the maritime Academy. This is because commander Evans was a Cherokee Indian and it was absolutely rare of some one of Evans heritage to be accepted into the U.S Naval Academy.However according to Hal M. Friedman one of the reviewers of doubting Thomas work, â€Å"Thomas mentions these things but without developing them. One would like to know more about detailors in Evans’s family background that helped him in his education, propel him to join the Navy, and enabled him to overcome the prejudices in the glide by to obtain an Academy appointment. Again, these are all menti oned by Thomas but not in as thorough a manner as the rarity of the accomplishments requires.” This could mayhap be one of the shortcomings of the book.Another possible subtopic could be Kuritas decision not to sacrifice thousands of lives. Had he not made this choice past the Americans would totally have been destroyed. This gives us a point to ponder about. Why did he do it?The author wears his theme/ thesis firstly by making it cognise that these men had inner conflicts that would have deterred them from achieving their goal. This is in truth where the fact of will power comes in because had it not been due to this self convincing then they would have failed in their missions by simply giving upThe other support for the theme is that without any support, Spragues forces puta shockingly cruel fight  in which Evans  strongly featured. This shows the human body being put to the running of time and it cleverly brings out the fact about human judgment for the Sprague ’s could simply have seen their enemies then dissolve to run for cover. But on the unconnected they perceived the situation in a different perspective (Judgment) then mulish to give them the Japanese a real hard battle.Moving away from the dimension of the themes usage in the winning of the battle, we realize that once more it was will power that enabled the Japanese melt down fifty long hours in cheat infested waters of the ocean after their send off sunk.  It took a lot of self will to choose to hold on in this situation for many a bulk would have simply given up.Does the author successfully support his theme? nearly according to these three examples and other numerous ones in the book I gestate he does. He just does not implicitly express his theme but he goes right ahead and gives try out to emphasize his theme\r\n'